A former U.S.Ryder Cup captain has publicly criticised the decision to stage the match at Bethpage Black, declaring “I really don’t like Bethpage” and labelling the selection “a mistake.” The blunt critique targets the Long Island public layout within bethpage State Park – a course renowned for hosting U.S. Opens in 2002, 2009 and 2019 – and has intensified debate about venue choice, competitive balance and player safety in the run-up to the event.
Governing bodies establish formal routes for LIV players to reach The Open, sharpening technical demands for qualifiers
With organisers confirming a structured qualification route for LIV competitors to reach The Open, aspiring entrants face an increasingly exacting test of technical consistency and on-course decision-making. Coaches should reinforce basic setup checkpoints: a neutral grip, roughly 15° knee flex, and a balanced address posture with approximately 10-15° spine tilt for driver work and a slightly more upright position for mid‑iron shots.Adapting to links‑style or major‑grade conditions requires objective verification – use video or a mirror to confirm ball position (about 1.5-2 clubheads inside the left heel for driver; centred to slightly forward for long irons) because firm turf, gusting wind and tournament pin positions amplify small setup errors at designated qualifying events where ranking points and exemptions are at stake.
Swing sequencing should prioritise reproducibility under pressure: break the motion into takeaway, coil, transition, impact and release and practise each segment. Target a shoulder turn around 90°-100° for average club players and 100°-120° for lower handicaps to balance torque and repeatability. Maintain an iron attack angle near -4° to -2° to achieve compression and a driver angle between -1° and +3° to optimise launch. Useful, time‑boxed drills include:
- Slow‑motion impact swings: 10 reps with a square face at impact, checking divot location promptly after contact for irons.
- Weighted‑club oscillations: three sets of 20 to ingrain shoulder timing and tempo.
- Impact‑tape sessions: 20 shots to shift strikes toward the center of the face.
Schedule each drill in 15-20 minute segments and log results to monitor changes in ball flight and dispersion.
Success in qualifiers often hinges on short‑game excellence, so devote roughly one‑third of practice time to wedges and putting. For chips, employ a practical “two‑club” rule in training – pick a club that lands the ball on the green then lets it run to the hole – and mark increments in 2-3 yard steps. In bunkers, emphasise an open face, wider stance and striking the sand 1-2 inches behind the ball; practise a ¾ swing with an accelerated finish to exit firm bunkers that punish tentative moves. Putting should stress either a consistent arc or face‑forward stroke and measurable objectives, such as reducing three‑putts to 0-1 per round within eight weeks using distance ladders (3, 6, 9, 12 ft). Common errors and quick fixes:
- Chunked chips – shift weight to the front foot and shorten the wrist hinge.
- Thin bunker strikes – widen stance, increase effective loft and accelerate through the sand.
- Over‑rotation on the stroke - stabilise the lower body and hinge from the shoulders only.
Course tactics must flex with setup and weather conditions.The former captain’s remark – “I really don’t like Bethpage” – highlights how punitive routing can force conservative play. In narrow or penal fairways, plan to play to an aiming point rather than raw distance: identify safe carry yardages (for example, 230-260 yd driver carry) and set a clear cut‑off for high‑risk shots. Use wind charts, green firmness and hole locations to choose clubs that leave wedge distances you trust – aim to leave yourself between 50 and 120 yards more often than not.Troubleshooting checkpoints:
- Pre‑shot routine: visualise the shot shape and landing area, then pick an intermediate target 10-20 yards ahead to fine‑tune alignment.
- Club‑selection matrix: document carry and roll figures for each club in different wind conditions.
- Penalty mitigation: when unsure, play away from hazards and accept a par rather than chase a low‑percentage shot.
Build weekly and longer‑term plans tied to qualification windows and ranking objectives. A practical template: 3-4 sessions weekly (60-90 minutes each) allocating roughly 30% to full swing, 40% to short game and 30% to putting and mental prep.Track progress with objective metrics – fairways hit %, GIR %, up‑and‑down %, and two‑putt % – and set incremental targets (e.g., a 5% GIR increase over six weeks). Equipment checks are vital: confirm loft and lie settings, validate driver loft against launch monitor figures (ideal driver launch 10°-14° with spin varying 1,800-3,000 rpm depending on conditions) and inspect wedge grooves for conformity. For mental conditioning,use breathing techniques and a concise pre‑shot checklist; match coaching methods to the learner – video feedback for visual players,weighted‑club drills for kinesthetic learners and tempo counting for auditory learners. These disciplined, measurable routines will help players at all levels convert technical gains into lower scores during the qualifying series that now feed into The Open.
Ex‑captain calls Bethpage setup punitive and urges shorter tees and fairer hole locations
In a stark assessment that has provoked discussion among competitors and coaches, an ex‑U.S. captain labelled a recent Bethpage setup punitive - contending it emphasizes raw distance over fair shot‑making. That criticism – summarised by the line ”I really don’t like Bethpage” – captures a concern that extreme length and tucked pins can convert precision golf into damage limitation. Under USGA and R&A authority, tournament committees set tees and pins, but when a course is lengthened by 200-400 yards or pins sit within 6-8 feet of steep lips, the smartest strategy for many players is to aim for the centre of the green and accept a two‑putt rather than gamble for heroic lines that carry heavy downside.
When distance becomes the primary variable,tweak mechanics rather than remodelling the swing. For players hitting longer clubs into greens, stress a controlled setup: move ball position slightly back for long irons, adopt a stance about shoulder‑width plus one hand for extra stability and feel a 60/40 weight bias to the front foot at impact. Aim for a shallower long‑iron attack (near neutral to -1°) to improve contact, and a mildly positive driver attack (+2° to +4°) to boost carry. Simple, scalable drills:
- Impact‑bag compressions for long‑iron feel (5-10 reps focused on forward shaft lean).
- Half‑to‑full swing progressions with an alignment stick on the target line to promote a shallower delivery.
- Step‑through drill to encourage proper weight transfer (10 reps).
These can be adjusted for beginners through low‑handicappers by changing swing length and target difficulty.
Short‑game adaptability and green reading become decisive when pins are punitive. For a flag tucked behind a false front,prefer a bump‑and‑run or a low‑trajectory wedge shot that uses run rather than flight to control variability. Set measurable wedge control goals – land 50‑, 75‑ and 100‑yard pitches within 5-10 yards at an ~80% success rate. For putting, quantify slope: on moderate greens expect a change in line of roughly 1-2 inches per foot on mid‑range putts and use methods like AimPoint or hands‑on feel to calibrate reads. Reinforce these skills with drills:
- Landing‑zone practice: land nine balls inside a 10‑yard circle from 50, 75 and 100 yards.
- 3‑6‑10 putting ladder: make 8/10 from 3 ft,6/10 from 6 ft,4/10 from 10 ft.
- Trajectory control set: hit 10 shots at low, standard and high trajectories to link technique with scoring on arduous hole locations.
Course strategy should be explicit and repeatable.Against length and tucked pins,construct a match‑play or stroke‑play blueprint that reduces variance: map bailout targets that leave approaches of 110-130 yards (where wedge control is strongest) instead of forcing full‑carry shots. If a green slopes right‑to‑left and the pin is left, aim for right‑centre and let the contour feed the ball. Quick rules of thumb:
- If wind exceeds 15 mph, add one club for carry and aim for the middle of the green.
- If firm surfaces reduce stopping power, favour lower trajectories with less spin.
- If a pin sits on a steep slope, target the safe half of the green and only attack when you have a high‑percentage wedge.
These heuristics help players make consistent choices and lower the cost of aggressive errors.
Combine equipment checks, structured practice schedules and mental habits to mirror tougher setups: choose wedge loft and bounce to match turf (more bounce in soft turf, less bounce on firm lies), confirm shaft flex and lie for consistent launch, and adopt a weekly plan – such as two 45‑minute short‑game sessions, one 60‑minute full‑swing session and three 30‑minute putting blocks. Mental rehearsal is vital: visualise target‑area shots and recovery sequences. Beginners should prioritise fundamentals (grip pressure ~4/10, neutral grip, square face at address); low handicappers should target tight dispersion (e.g.,95% of wedge shots within 15 yards at practice distances). Finish each session by noting one reproducible mechanical cue and one pre‑shot routine element to carry onto the course. Turning the debate over setup into practical instruction will improve scoring and decision‑making across skill levels.
Players flag safety, pace and turf issues at Bethpage; call for clearer yardages and turf care
Competitors at Bethpage have reported tangible concerns about safety, pace and uneven turf that influence club choice and on‑course judgement. Those practical problems – highlighted in the captain’s criticism – require both tactical player adjustments and clearer lines of communication from event organisers. Before each round, confirm local rules, pace‑of‑play expectations and any Ground Under Repair (GUR) designations. When yardage markers are ambiguous or turf is patchy, follow a simple pre‑shot checklist: (1) confirm the target line with a rangefinder or GPS, (2) assess lie and firmness, and (3) pick a club that gives a margin for error – typically add one club for soft ground or reduce loft by 1-2° when greens are slow.This approach preserves safety,speeds decision‑making and aligns with tournament conduct guidelines.
From a mechanics viewpoint, refine setup and strike to cope with variable surfaces and narrower fairways. Start with fundamentals: feet shoulder‑width for mid‑irons, slightly narrower for wedges; position the ball 1-1.5 inches forward of centre for long irons and just forward of centre for hybrids, moving progressively back for shorter clubs. Work toward a controlled shoulder turn of 70°-90° for a full swing, with a neutral to slightly forward shaft lean at address to encourage crisp compression. Common faults include overstepping at the top (which reduces width) and excessive lateral head movement (causing fat or thin shots). A useful compression drill: place a towel about 1 inch behind the ball and practise striking the ball cleanly without touching the towel; aim to cut fat/bladed shots by 75% over two weeks.
Short‑game adjustments are essential on courses with mixed turf and varying green speeds. Walk around the hole to assess grain and slope and choose an intermediate aiming point rather than relying on a single visual line. For putting, use measurable drills: set tees at 6, 12 and 18 ft and aim to make 30 consecutive putts from each distance with target make rates of roughly 80% at 6 ft, 60% at 12 ft and 40% at 18 ft. Chipping and bunker play should prioritise consistent contact and trajectory control – for a bump‑and‑run, move the ball back in the stance, open the face slightly and use a shallow attack angle (around -2° to -4°) to let firm turf cradle the shot; in soft turf, adopt a steeper attack to get the ball out clean. Recommended drills:
- Clock‑face wedge routine: eight shots around a target at 10, 20 and 30 yards.
- Two‑ball putting drill: one ball to practise line, one for speed control.
- Bunker splash practice: consistently land balls inside a 6‑ft circle.
Course management and shot shaping link technique to score control, especially where markers and turf are inconsistent. Adopt percentage golf when markers are unclear: play to a landing zone you can hit at least 70% of the time rather than chasing low‑probability lines. For shaping,train face‑to‑path relationships: to produce a controlled fade,set the body 2°-4° left of target and open the face ~1°-2° to that line; reverse that for a draw. Use alignment rods to train specific paths (a rod angled 5° off target visually programmes the required swing path).When fairways are tight or rough is penal, prefer conservative tee strategies – for instance, lay up to leave a 100-120 yard approach instead of risking driver over trouble - which reduces recovery time and helps keep pace for following groups.
Implement a measurable practice plan that addresses safety, pace and scoring over a six‑week block. Sample structure:
- Weeks 1-2: setup and compression focus (500 quality iron strikes per week, target 80% clean contact).
- Weeks 3-4: short‑game control (200 purposeful chips/putts daily, target 50% reduction in three‑putts).
- weeks 5-6: course‑management scenarios (simulated rounds emphasising conservative club selection and pace).
Include mental and safety routines – a pre‑shot checklist under 30 seconds, footing checks on wet or sloped lies, and clear hazard/callouts – and tailor drills to ability (low handicappers refine attack angle and shaping; beginners focus on consistent setup and contact). Always measure outcomes with objective stats (fairways hit, GIR, putts per round) to ensure training converts into safer, faster and lower scoring play.
Spectator flow and broadcast sightlines hampered at Bethpage – propose re‑routing and improved viewing platforms
Organisers and designers have acknowledged that spectator circulation and broadcast sightlines were strained during the Bethpage event, and critics have pointed to that as part of the wider critique – echoing the sentiment “I really don’t like Bethpage.” From a coaching standpoint, altered sightlines, crowded walkways and unexpected visual clutter change the playing surroundings: shadows, variable noise and proximate cameras can disrupt tempo and alignment. The immediate coaching remedy is to reinforce a consistent pre‑shot routine,including an alignment check (use a 1‑inch alignment rod or club on the ground) and a breathing cadence (for example 3 in,3 out) to steady tempo. If a player’s line of sight is compromised by spectators or equipment, stop and call a rules official to seek relief rather than guessing.
Practical course‑fabric proposals should prioritise safety, clear landing corridors and broadcast capability.Recommendations include rerouting spectator paths to maintain a 30-40 yard lateral clear zone around primary landing areas and greens, elevating broadcast platforms to 8-12 ft to secure unobstructed sightlines without impeding players, and designing walkways at least 6-8 ft wide with gradients below 5% for safe, steady traffic and emergency access. Increasing gallery separation restores visual references – fairway widths and bunker edges become reliable aiming cues – enabling golfers to commit to shot shapes with specific curvature. Coaches should train players to select a near and far aiming point; for example, practise targeting a 20‑yard band at 250 yards and reproduce that under simulated crowd noise.
On the playing surface, instruction must prioritise swing mechanics, short‑game versatility and equipment choices suitable for tight corridors and firm, undulating greens. Reaffirm setup fundamentals: ball position (approx. 7-8 cm inside lead heel for long irons; centred for wedges), modest spine tilt toward the target for driver (~3-5°) and a neutral grip with 10-20° wrist hinge at the top. For short game,practise trajectory control: a bump‑and‑run with a 7‑iron using 60-70% speed to land 5-10 yards short of the hole and a lob using a gap wedge opened 10-15° while accelerating through the ball to avoid fat shots. Suggested drills:
- Alignment ladder: two rods 18 inches apart; hit 30 balls aiming to pass the clubhead between them on the downswing.
- Proximity ladder: from 50, 75 and 100 yards hit 10 shots each aiming to finish within 10-15 feet; record misses to build a baseline.
- Crowd‑noise simulation: practise 20 putts and 20 swings using recorded crowd sounds at varying volumes to build focus.
Course management turns measurable strategy into lower scores. For beginners, opt for a conservative routing plan: play to the widest fairway and leave 100-120 yards into the green where wedges yield the highest percentage of greens hit. Intermediate players should practise shaping the ball between hazards – e.g., a 6-8 yard draw over a 200‑yard flight to avoid bunkers. low handicappers must quantify risk: if carrying trouble requires 240 yards, plan a controlled 220‑yard tee shot to leave a comfortable 120‑yard approach for your most reliable club. Common errors include over‑aggression off the tee and misjudging wind – mitigate with a three‑shot strategy (drive, layup, attack) for risk holes and use a wind chart: adjust yardage roughly 10% per 10 mph of head/tail wind during practice and play.
Integrate spectator and broadcast solutions into player preparation so the competitive environment is consistent. Place television towers and camera platforms to minimise glare and avoid casting shadows over tees and greens; broadcasters should use directional microphones and delayed crowd feeds to limit live noise interference. For on‑course training, teach an adaptive pre‑shot checklist (1. Visualise line; 2. Pick exact yardage; 3. align feet and club; 4. Final breath and swing) and set measurable targets such as cutting three‑putts by 50% in eight weeks via 20 minutes of green‑reading drills each session. Offer varied practice modes - video analysis for visual learners, weighted‑club tempo work for kinesthetic players and metronome drills for auditory learners – so all athletes can internalise the adjustments. Reconfigured routes and improved viewing infrastructure don’t just help spectators and TV viewers; they restore consistent visual cues that underpin better mechanics, smarter course management and improved scoring at elite events.
Calls grow for a rethink on Ryder Cup venue choice – balance penal tests with layouts that reward shotmaking
Designers and captains are again debating whether elite match play should privilege brutally penal venues or courses that reward inventive shot‑making. The row over Bethpage Black – captured in the ex‑captain’s line “I really don’t like Bethpage” – underscores a wider instructional point: players must be able to tailor technique to the venue.On penal tracks with rough over 3-4 inches and fairways narrowing to 25-35 yards, the margin for error is tiny, so coaches should emphasise situational fundamentals - alignment, club choice and risk assessment – enabling golfers to switch between conservative and attacking tactics depending on pin position, wind and hole geometry.
At the swing level, refining face angle, trajectory and dispersion is key on penal but rewarding courses. Revisit setup basics: ball one ball left of centre for mid‑irons, slightly forward for long clubs; weight distribution around 55/45 at address for stability; and a deliberate shoulder turn – roughly 45° for full shots (scaled for the player). For shaping, practise a slightly closed face with a shallower path to draw and an open face with an out‑to‑in path to fade. Drills to build repeatability:
- Alignment‑stick routine: two sticks on the ground to lock target and foot lines (10 minutes per session).
- Gate drill for face control: a narrow gate at impact to enforce a square face through contact.
- 45° hinge practise: rehearse a consistent wrist set to aid transition and compression.
These exercises reduce common faults like overcasting or flipping at impact and tighten dispersion on narrow fairways.
Short‑game competence becomes essential where par is defended by deep bunkers and lightning‑fast, contoured greens.Inside 60 yards, focus on three reliable options: a bump‑and‑run (lower‑loft feel), a standard pitch with controlled backspin and a lob for soft‑landing shots when the pin is tight. Putting should combine speed control and slope reading: measure putt lengths in paces and on greens steeper than about 3° use the low‑point method – stand behind the ball to find the fall line and practise lag drills to leave putts within 3 feet from 20-40 feet. Common fixes:
- Chunked pitch – shift weight toward the front (60/40) and accelerate through the ball.
- Over‑hitting bunker shots – open the face but keep body alignment square; strike 1-2 inches behind the sand contact point.
Course management is where individual shots translate into match results. Using the Bethpage debate as a case study, positional golf – aiming for the largest safe target rather than the flag - should be the default when hazards are penal. For beginners, adopt a conservative plan: play to the short side, avoid long rough and target a 60% fairway hit rate while reducing penalty strokes by one per round. Advanced players should practice intentional shaping and visualisation to convert risk into reward. Scenario drills:
- Wind practice: play nine holes using one club more or less than usual to learn trajectory control.
- Flag‑placement simulation: during practice rounds, imagine pins front/middle/back and choose layups that optimise approach angles.
These routines establish the decision framework needed when a venue is perceived as overly penal for match play.
Equipment, session planning and mental preparation complete a rounded training plan. Evaluate lofts and shaft flex so carries fit narrow fairways – for example, test a stronger‑lofted 3‑wood to reliably carry 220-240 yards – and run ball‑compression checks to stabilise approach spin. Weekly structure: three sessions (one full‑swing, one short‑game, one play‑simulation) with measurable outputs such as proximity to hole and putts per round. Cater to diverse learners with video, slow‑motion reps and crisp verbal cues. Above all, integrate mental tools – short pre‑shot breathing and one‑minute visualisation – to cut reactive mistakes on penal holes. Through targeted drills and smart strategy,players can convert a controversial course like Bethpage into a sharpening ground that rewards disciplined,creative golf.
Organisers face pressure to demand independent course audits and mandatory player consultation before confirming venues
Media outlets and player organisations are urging tournament bodies to commission independent course reviews and require mandatory player consultation prior to venue confirmation, arguing that setup decisions materially influence scoring and training priorities. That change matters to coaches because course characteristics (fairway width, rough height, green complexity) determine where to focus preparation – for instance, narrow fairways and penal native rough tilt emphasis toward shot‑shaping and trajectory over raw distance. Instructors should use independent review data (e.g., green speeds, teeing area widths, rough heights) to align practice: if a review shows Stimpmeter readings of 11-12 ft and severe slopes, prioritise pace control and uphill/downhill reads. Tournament organisers publishing measurable setup metrics would allow coaches to match technical work to course demands.
Technically, calibrate setup and swing to the venue. on long, firm tracks, target a driver attack angle around +1° to +3° to maximise carry; on firm links‑type iron approaches maintain a negative attack angle of -3° to -6° for clean divots and consistent spin. Beginners should start with neutral fundamentals – neutral grip, centred ball for short irons and gradually forward for driver – with a driver spine tilt of roughly 5° away from the target. Advanced players refine face‑to‑path ratios for shot shape: close the face 2°-4° to the path for a draw and open by a similar amount for a fade.Core drills and checkpoints:
- Alignment rod drill to fix feet, shoulder and target lines.
- Impact tape/face spray to monitor centre contact and face orientation.
- Metronome tempo drill (2:1 backswing to downswing) to steady transitions.
These link posture basics to advanced shaping goals with measurable feedback.
Short‑game instruction should react directly to green‑complex audits. for undulating greens teach slope reads using the clock‑face technique (visualise the high point at 12 o’clock) and calibrate pace to sinking targets: beginners aim for 60% inside 6 ft, intermediates for 75% and low handicappers 85%+. putters should maintain ~3°-4° dynamic loft and favour a straight‑back, straight‑through action. For chips and pitches, practise bump‑and‑run versus flop; set front‑foot weight at 60-70% for bump‑and‑runs and shorten wrist hinge; open stance and increase hinge for lobs.Drills:
- Gate drill for consistent bunker contact (two tees forming a gate).
- Distance ladder: chips to 5,10,15,20 yards,recording proximity to measure control within ~3 yards.
These exercises deliver measurable short‑game gains across green types.
Teaching course management and shot selection as strategic skills is critical when organisers solicit player feedback on venue fairness. Coach conservative target lines when fairways are narrow or rough deep – for example, aim 10-20 yards right when left misses are more penal. Account for elevation and wind: generally change club one distance step for every 10-15 yards of elevation and add one club for roughly 15 mph of headwind. Teach shaping via face‑to‑path differentials – small curvature arises from a 2°-5° difference – and practice these on pre‑set range targets. Transition to on‑course scenarios that mimic independent review findings (tight corridors, penal rough, firm greens) so that decision‑making under pressure becomes automatic.
Embed these technical and strategic elements in periodised practice plans tied to review outcomes and player consultation feedback. A three‑week pre‑event plan might allocate 40% to short game and putting when greens are fast and sloped,30% to iron accuracy and 30% to driver trajectory and shaping. Set measurable weekly goals – cut three‑putts by 50%, hit 65%+ fairways, reduce dispersion to ±10 yards with a chosen iron – and adapt based on consultation insights. Provide scalable drills for varied abilities (one‑handed chipping for mobility limits, alignment aids for visual learners) and emphasise mental preparation: routine rehearsal, breathing and decision trees. Governance reforms will only be effective if coaches and players can convert published course metrics into actionable, measurable practice plans.
Reputational risk for U.S. golf drives calls for standard assessment protocols and contingency planning
Controversial course setups can damage the reputations of venues and governing bodies over time, and that risk shapes how instructors prepare players. The recent commentary – “I really don’t like Bethpage” – demonstrates how extreme tee placements,penal rough and tight landing zones force changes in shot repertoire and course strategy. Teach shot‑shaping early and systematically: progress from neutral shapes to deliberate fades and draws via controlled face rotation and path adjustments. Measurable targets for full swings might include a shoulder turn of 80°-90°, hip rotation of 40°-45°, spine tilt of 6°-8° toward the lead side and impact 2-3 inches ahead of the ball for crisp iron contact. Useful practises include alignment‑rod gates and impact‑bag series (10 compressions at 75% speed,10 at full speed) to cultivate forward shaft lean and low‑point control.
Short‑game and green reading are decisive when greens are tight or run fast. Reinforce fundamentals: wedge ball position just back of centre, hands slightly ahead to encourage a descending blow, and open the stance 0-2° for flop or soft‑landing shots.Practise on greens with Stimp values between 8 and 12 where feasible.Drills to build pressure‑resilient feel:
- 3‑ft make streaks: make 20 in a row to build short putt confidence.
- Lag drill: from 40-60 ft aim to leave 1-2 ft for every 10 ft of distance into a 6‑ft circle.
- Break recognition: walk a putt’s arc from different vantage points to learn grain and slope.
Also teach slope translation – add speed on faster greens; into a 10-15 mph crosswind, consider a half‑to‑one club increase - and remind players about relief options such as Rule 16.1 for abnormal course conditions.
Standardise strategy and club selection in instruction to reduce situational reputational risk and prepare players for penal or contentious setups. Start each hole with a decision tree: define carry yardages, identify penal zones and bailout lines, then select clubs to hit the intended landing area rather than the green edge. Use launch‑monitor data to set carry distances per club (for many competent amateurs a 7‑iron carry might be 140-160 yards depending on gear). Practice a three‑quarter control routine – hit 10 balls at 75%,80% and 100% effort and chart average carries and dispersion. in windy or narrow conditions, add one club per ~15 mph headwind and prioritise shapes that move the ball away from trouble.
Equipment,setup fundamentals and repeatable practice protocols underpin long‑term progress and should include specific,measurable goals. Loft ranges: pitching wedge 44-48°, gap 50-52°, sand wedge 54-58° – explain how loft alters trajectory and spin. Core setup checkpoints:
- Grip pressure: light to moderate (~4/10 tension) to allow release.
- Stance width: shoulder width for mid‑irons; 2-3 inches wider for driver.
- Ball position: centre for mid‑irons; 1-1.5 ball diameters inside lead heel for driver; tee so about half the ball is above the club crown.
Reccommend modular 30‑minute sessions focused on a single skill (e.g., 15 minutes impact work, 10 minutes trajectory control, 5 minutes review) and weekly targets such as reducing 7‑iron dispersion to 15 yards or raising up‑and‑down conversion to 60%+ from within 30 yards.
Address mental preparation and contingency planning to protect performance and reputations when setups are controversial or change abruptly. Implement standardised on‑course protocols: pre‑round yardage checks, club‑by‑club carry charts and a simple contingency plan for each hole (safe line, aggressive line, recovery option). Evaluate progress via performance metrics – GIR, scrambling % and strokes‑gained components – and shift practice emphasis accordingly. Provide varied learning pathways (video for visual learners, impact‑feel drills for kinesthetic players, launch‑monitor data for analytical players). End practice with pressure simulation – for example, hole‑out from the fringe with crowd noise – so skills transfer under competitive conditions.Together, these technical, tactical and mental layers form a resilient instructional framework that limits performance volatility when public criticism or course changes bring scrutiny to setup decisions.
Q&A
Q: Who made the criticism of bethpage?
A: A former U.S. Ryder Cup captain publicly criticised Bethpage Black, saying “I really don’t like Bethpage” and calling its selection for the Ryder Cup “a mistake,” according to media reports.
Q: What did he object to specifically?
A: He said the course is ill‑suited to the Ryder Cup format, raising concerns about layout choices, excessive difficulty and impacts on match strategy and spectator experience.
Q: When and where were the comments made?
A: The remarks were made in recent public comments reported by the press; organisers and the captain’s team have been asked for clarification.
Q: How have organisers reacted?
A: At the time of reporting, official replies from Ryder Cup organisers and affiliated PGA entities were limited; event organisers are commonly approached for statements in such disputes.Q: What do players and captains say about venue selection generally?
A: Opinions differ – some players welcome demanding venues that reward creative shot‑making while others worry overly punitive setups skew match play and limit tactical options.
Q: What is Bethpage Black noted for?
A: Bethpage Black,in Farmingdale,New York,is a famously stern public course that has hosted multiple U.S. opens (2002, 2009, 2019) and is known for its penal rough, narrow corridors and demanding green complexes.
Q: Could the criticism change the event?
A: Public debate can put pressure on organisers to review setup plans and spectator arrangements, but changing a Ryder Cup site or contractual commitments at short notice is improbable.
Q: Why does venue selection matter for the Ryder cup?
A: The chosen course shapes strategic choices, affects home‑advantage dynamics, influences the viewing experience and raises safety considerations - achieving a balance between challenge and fairness is essential for match play.
Q: What happens next?
A: Expect continued coverage: organisers may release statements,the former captain might expand or clarify his views,and players,officials and stakeholders will likely be asked to contribute to the discussion before the event.
The captain’s blunt assessment has intensified scrutiny over venue choice and course setup as attention shifts to Bethpage Black and the upcoming ryder Cup. whether his comments will prompt concrete changes or merely fuel debate remains to be seen as players, officials and fans prepare for the match.

Ryder Cup Controversy: Former U.S. Captain Slams Bethpage as the Wrong Choice for Golf’s Biggest Stage
The criticism: why a former U.S. captain objects
A former U.S. Ryder Cup captain has publicly criticized the selection of Bethpage Black as the venue for the next Ryder Cup, arguing the public, penal layout and site logistics make it an unsuitable stage for golf’s premier team match-play event. Reports that the 2025 U.S. Ryder cup will be staged at Bethpage Black have intensified debate over course selection and competitive fairness (see related coverage on the 2025 U.S. roster and venue).
Key issues raised against Bethpage
- Course architecture & match-play fit: Critics say Bethpage black’s severe rough,tight driving corridors and penal out-of-position consequences reward length over shot-shaping - a mismatch with match-play tactics that often require risk-reward creativity.
- Home-course advantage concerns: Some argue the layout favors players accustomed to the venue and U.S. style setups, raising questions about neutrality in a biennial international contest.
- Spectator logistics & infrastructure: becuase Bethpage is a public course inside a suburban area, there are concerns about parking, transit capacity, local accommodation and crowd circulation on championship week.
- Television sightlines & fan experience: The dense tree lines and narrow corridors could limit camera positions and reduce the variety of fan viewing points compared with more open links-style venues.
- Course setup vs. match-play spectacle: Overly penal pin positions and extreme green speeds can create high variance, perhaps reducing the strategic, head-to-head drama organizers seek for ryder Cup pairings.
Context: why Bethpage was chosen
Bethpage Black offers a compelling pedigree: it is a public, historic championship venue that has hosted major professional golf events and brings a passionate local fan base. Event organizers have sought iconic American venues that can generate high ticket demand and strong TV audiences. The selection is also consistent with the Ryder Cup’s interest in staging matches at bold, memorable U.S. sites that showcase the game to broader domestic audiences.
Course design and match-play suitability
Understanding how course characteristics affect match play helps explain the debate:
- Tight fairways: Favor high-accuracy players. In match play, a single errant drive that finds deep rough or trouble can immediately swing a match.
- Deep rough and penal bunkers: Increase the importance of distance and recovery skill. A layout that punishes missed fairways reduces the reward for creative approach shots.
- Small, sloped greens: Will highlight short-game and putting; extreme speeds and subtle breaks can lead to three-putts and momentum swings.
- risk-reward holes: Well-placed risk-reward opportunities keep match play exciting. Critics contend Bethpage’s setup emphasizes punishment over enticing risk choices.
How match play differs from stroke play
Match play is head-to-head: players only need to beat their opponent on each hole, not the entire field. This dynamic makes strategic pairings, momentum, and match-specific tactics crucial. Consequently, venues that invite a mix of tactical options – reachable par-5s, short risk-reward par-4s, and holes that reward shot-making creativity – are frequently enough preferred. Critics argue Bethpage’s penal nature may reduce such options and produce conservative play and fewer dramatic swings.
Defenders of bethpage: counterarguments
- Testing championship golf: Supporters say the Ryder Cup should be a stern test; Bethpage’s setup forces players to perform under pressure, which can produce memorable moments.
- Public-course legacy: Bethpage is emblematic of accessible American golf and staging the ryder Cup there increases exposure and inspires local communities.
- Fan atmosphere: The suburban location and passionate local support can create intense home-field energy, a hallmark of classic Ryder Cups.
- Operational experience: Bethpage has hosted major events before, demonstrating the venue can be configured for high-profile broadcast, ticketing and spectator needs.
Logistics, safety and fan experience concerns
Large international events demand precise operational planning. Organizers must address multiple logistical pain points to deliver a safe, high-quality fan experience at venues like Bethpage:
- Transport and parking: Plan shuttle routes, park-and-ride systems and coordinate with local transit to avoid gridlock.
- Accommodations: Ensure adequate hotels and hospitality zones for international visitors and the press corps.
- Security and crowd control: Implement marshals, clear sightlines, and emergency access plans across the property.
- Broadcasting infrastructure: Build camera platforms and sightlines that preserve the television narrative of match-play battles.
Case studies: lessons from previous major championships
When venues host major golf events, certain success and failure patterns emerge. Key takeaways for organizers:
- flexible course setup – moderate rough heights and thoughtful tee placements can preserve difficulty without turning holes into lottery outcomes.
- Fan circulation planning – designated viewing zones, clear signage and ample amenities improve spectator satisfaction.
- Proactive transportation planning – early coordination with local authorities reduces bottlenecks and improves arrival times for fans and teams.
Impact on team composition and strategy
The choice of venue directly influences captain decisions and pairings:
- Player profiles: Captains may prefer long hitters if the course punishes missed fairways, or target shorter, accurate players for tight corridors.
- Pairing strategy: Teams will structure foursomes and fourballs to exploit course demands, pairing big hitters with strong ball-strikers or steady short-game specialists.
- Captain’s picks and momentum: The course can dictate which hot performers or experienced match-play specialists join the side.
Practical tips for fans and organizers
- For fans: Book travel early, use official shuttle services, check ticketing windows for best viewing holes, and arrive with weather-ready gear.
- For organizers: Adopt a balanced course setup that rewards good shot-making while allowing tactical match-play choices; scale services for peak attendance days; and work closely with local transit agencies.
Pros and cons at a glance
| Pros | cons |
|---|---|
| Historic,iconic U.S. venue | Potentially skewed home-course advantage |
| Passionate local fan base | Logistical challenges for transport & capacity |
| Tough test for competitors | Penal setup may reduce match-play creativity |
Possible fixes and middle-ground solutions
Organizers and golf authorities can take practical steps to address the core complaints while keeping Bethpage as host:
- Course moderation: Slightly reduce rough height, move some tee boxes up, or reconfigure a few pin positions to restore risk-reward balance.
- Strategic hole rotation: Modify the sequence or setup of select holes to create more variety in match-play opportunities.
- Infrastructure investments: Expand shuttle services, temporary parking fields, and hospitality villages to ease crowd flow.
- Transparent dialog: Open communication between captains, players and organizers can align expectations on course setup and match-play fairness.
What to watch next
- Official statements from event organizers about course setup and spectator plans.
- Reactions from players and captains that will clarify whether venue choice materially alters selection strategy.
- Operational updates on ticketing, transport and hospitality that will determine fan experience on the ground.
Sources and context
Coverage around the 2025 ryder Cup and the U.S. team roster notes the selection of Bethpage Black as the host venue. For reporting on team composition and venue context,see Golfweek’s breakdown of the 2025 U.S. Ryder Cup roster and venue planning. Event stakeholders - including captains, players and organizers – will shape the next phase of the discussion as setup details are finalized.
SEO keywords included
ryder Cup, Bethpage, Bethpage Black, Ryder Cup controversy, golf course selection, match play, Ryder Cup venue, spectator logistics, course setup, home advantage, golf strategy, Ryder Cup 2025.
Related: Breaking down the 12-man U.S. roster for the 2025 Ryder Cup (venue at Bethpage Black) - source: Golfweek / USA Today

