The Golf Channel for Golf Lessons

Unlock Elite Golf Performance: Science-Backed Putting, Swing & Driving Secrets

Unlock Elite Golf Performance: Science-Backed Putting, Swing & Driving Secrets

Introduction

putting sits at teh intersection ⁣of ​precision,‌ perception and learned motor control-often the​ most consistent short‑game skill yet one‍ whose success reflects subtle coordination among⁤ posture, timing and‍ decision-making. This article reframes putting as more ⁣than an isolated task: it is a testbed for principles that ⁣reliably transfer to full‑swing and driving performance. Drawing on recent biomechanical findings,motor‑learning research and applied practice⁣ methods,we isolate measurable drivers of putting repeatability and show how those ⁣same drivers-clubface‍ control,tempo regulation,impact location and balance-map directly onto kinematic sequencing and launch consistency in longer shots.

We use a measurement-frist​ approach. Core variables-putter face orientation at impact, ​stroke path, impact‍ location on the ​face, ‍stroke ​timing (backswing:downswing ratio)‍ and⁣ center‑of‑pressure behavior-are defined wiht practical measurement methods and realistic performance targets. Motor‑learning strategies ‍(blocked → ⁢variable practice, contextual interference, error augmentation, and ‌feedback schedules) are woven with biomechanical cues to ​produce ​drills and practice plans that produce robust learning and transfer. Where evidence exists, we link specific mechanical adjustments (for example,​ reducing face rotation through impact ‍or stabilizing the lead wrist) to ‍better distance control and improved‌ alignment, and explain how these aspects translate into tempo, sequencing⁣ and face control ‍for driving.The applied ‌sections ⁢convert ​theory into‍ usable protocols: simple assessment checklists, a ​graded drill progression from constrained to ‌representative, metrics to monitor progress (stroke-to-stroke variability,⁣ putts per round,⁢ dispersion relative to the aim ‍line), and‍ periodized ⁤practice that respects training load. The article finishes by synthesizing how mastering putting mechanics and learning strategies supports gains​ in ‍full‑swing timing and driving-especially in tempo regulation,⁣ rhythm stability and proximal‑to‑distal sequencing-providing coaches, sport scientists⁢ and experienced players with a unified, measurement‑driven framework ⁣to raise putting and ‍overall stroke performance.

Core Biomechanics of Putting ‍and‍ Why ​They‌ Matter for the Full Swing

Biomechanical principles that make​ a putt predictable-stable⁤ base, controlled‌ axis of​ rotation and efficient energy transfer-are the same rules⁤ that underpin a repeatable long game. At‍ address, prioritize a ‍consistent hip hinge and⁢ spine angle; a ‌practical target for many players is a spine ‍tilt in the ~20-30° range from⁤ vertical and minimal change through the stroke. ​From a movement‑control ‍outlook, superior putting‍ minimizes extraneous degrees of‌ freedom-especially wrist flex/ext and lateral torso sway-so adopt a shoulder‑driven‍ pendulum motion rather than a hands‑led action. Translating this to the full swing and driving, holding a stable spine angle and rotating around an axis (vs excessive ⁣lateral slide) ⁢helps ‌produce repeatable impact​ geometry and predictable​ launch conditions for both distance and direction.

Set‑up ​checks⁣ and equipment​ alignment have ​measurable consequences on‍ green and tee outcomes. Useful address checkpoints include:

  • Ball ⁣position: generally centered to about ​ one ball diameter forward of center to create a slight forward press without inducing ‌scooping;
  • Weight bias: a modest forward bias (~50-60%) ⁣stabilizes ‍low‑launch contact and limits⁢ unwanted lofting;
  • Eye line: over or marginally⁤ inside the ball line to encourage a square‍ face at impact;
  • Putter loft and lie: confirm approx. face loft and ensure length/lie fit​ your posture to remove compensatory⁣ wrist‍ movement.

Know your head⁤ type-face‑balanced⁢ vs toe‑hang-and​ select a ⁢stroke that ⁤complements⁢ it: face‑balanced⁢ putters ⁢for straighter ‌strokes, toe‑hang‌ for arced strokes.

Build a progressive practice ⁢routine that encodes reliable motor patterns and includes explicit metrics.Start each session with‍ 20⁢ makes inside ⁣3 ft to groove contact, then ‍progress through a ⁢structured set:

  • Gate for face control: tees ⁤slightly outside the putter head; complete 30 clean strokes without hitting the⁢ tees;
  • Distance ladder: practice to targets at 10, 20, 30 units ‍(use yards or feet appropriate to ability) and aim to stop inside⁤ 3 ft, repeating sets of 10;
  • Tempo work: use a metronome or internal count to⁢ maintain a ‍ 2:1 backswing‑to‑follow‑through rhythm.

Set measurable targets-e.g.,‌ complete 100 focused strokes ‍per​ session​ and work toward a benchmark⁤ such as 70% of lag putts from beyond 20 ft finishing inside 3 ft in a six‑week block.

Transferring putting mechanics to long shots improves scoring by reinforcing consistent rotation and postural⁢ control across‌ all⁤ strokes. Practice ‍slow‑motion shoulder pivots that preserve spine​ angle, and include impact‑hold drills to‍ feel how the lower body ‍stabilizes upper‑body rotation. ⁤Aim to reduce lateral sway to under ~2 ‌inches ​during the backswing for both short and long strokes; this helps keep the face square at impact. In on‑course scenarios-such as a firm, windy fairway where a low driver flight is ⁣desired-these ⁤same principles (stable axis and slight forward weight ⁣at impact) produce penetrating ball‌ flight and tighter dispersion.

Troubleshoot common faults and layer ‍in the mental and tactical‌ pieces that convert technical work into lower scores. Frequent errors ⁤include an overly tight grip, too ​much wrist activity, premature head lift and overreading subtle breaks.⁢ Use concise⁢ cues-keep grip pressure ​around 4-5/10, hold neutral wrists‍ through impact ⁢and keep​ the ⁤head motionless until after ​the putter stops. If face ⁢rotation is a problem, shorten‌ the stroke and reinforce a shoulder‑driven action; if pace is inconsistent, prioritize tempo‌ and ladder work; if alignment is off, practice ⁣with an‍ alignment rod and verify face angle in ​a mirror. Combine these technical interventions with a ​compact pre‑shot ‌routine and visualization to manage competitive stress.‍ The result: measurable pathways to better⁣ putting,steadier swings and more accurate driving.

Evidence Based metrics to Quantify Putting Stroke Consistency and Translate ⁢Gains to Driving Performance

practical Metrics That Capture Putting Consistency and Predict Driving Improvements

Start with objective measurement⁤ so practice‌ is driven‌ by data, not impressions. Combine a putting‑specific analyzer⁣ or launch ‍monitor, high‑speed ⁤video and simple on‑green‍ tools (alignment rod, ⁢mirror, impact tape). Useful‌ baseline metrics include face angle ​at impact (aim ±1-2°), initial ball direction (±1-2°), impact location ​(central ⁢10-15 mm), stroke path, and tempo ratio (target 2:1 for many distances). Validate eye‑over‑ball, shoulder plane and shaft lean with an alignment rod to ensure ⁣subsequent‍ changes reflect ‍technique, not setup drift.

Address one metric‌ at a time with progressive overload and feedback. Prioritize face control and impact location as they most directly affect roll quality. Example practice ⁢tools:

  • Gate drill to ‍hold a square face and consistent⁢ path;
  • Impact tape to map contact‌ distribution and adjust ball position/shaft lean to center impacts;
  • Metronome drills (60-72 bpm) to ⁢cement a 2:1 tempo feeling for short strokes.

Use video or IMU feedback to verify minimal face rotation (1-3° for players making clear improvement) and that ​forward roll starts early (within the first ~18-24 inches). Progress from short to medium to long ⁢distances while keeping ⁢measured metrics steady.

To translate putting gains into driving, emphasize shared movement qualities: tempo, balance and ‍consistent impact geometry. ‍Reliable putting tempo and balance indicate improved neuromuscular timing ⁤that ⁤can transfer to the driver. Apply the same objective mindset at the range: measure clubhead speed, face angle‌ at impact, launch angle and lateral dispersion⁤ on a launch monitor. Set transfer targets-e.g.,preserve a consistent pre‑shot‌ routine and tempo,keep⁢ clubface within ±2° at ⁣impact,and maintain a ⁢repeatable attack angle (commonly +1° to ‌+3° for drivers). Transfer drills include slow→fast⁤ sequencing (tempo ladder), finish‑hold balance work, and impact‑tape feedback‍ on the⁤ driver to⁤ reinforce centered contact; these interventions typically reduce ​dispersion and improve carry consistency when practiced deliberately.

Use metrics ‌to inform on‑course decisions. If practice data show stable face control but inconsistent⁤ speed on‍ fast greens, prioritize lagging in practice ⁤and adopt a conservative approach in play inside ~30-40 ft. If⁣ driving data show tight dispersion but short carry, consider equipment (tee⁣ height or loft) before making technical swing changes. ‌Adjust strategies to weather ‌and green condition: in high wind or on firm ⁣surfaces ⁤favor lower flights and reduced⁣ spin; on greens ⁤with strong grain or slope reduce break compensation‍ by aiming for safer landing zones. These course choices should​ be ‍guided by quantified likelihoods of execution derived from your practice metrics.

Build an evidence‑based weekly plan with milestones and⁢ troubleshooting checkpoints.Example weekly⁤ targets: center‑face ⁣contact >80% from 6 ‌ft, tempo variance <±10%, driver lateral dispersion within ~10-15 yards. Troubleshooting:

  • Persistent face ⁢angle errors ‍→ simplify to a shoulder ‍pendulum, increase ⁤mirror checks and reduce wrist movement;
  • Poor speed⁣ control → ladder drills​ (3-6-9-12 ft) and measure first‑roll distance;
  • Large driving dispersion → review grip pressure, stance⁢ width and weight transfer⁤ using slow‑motion video⁤ and impact tape.

Include equipment ⁤checks (putter loft/lie, head type; driver loft/shaft flex)‍ as part of data‌ collection rather than opinion. combine​ a two‑step pre‑shot routine with ‍process goals (e.g., “execute tempo ​and alignment”) and convert technical improvements ⁢into lower ‍scores via disciplined, metric‑driven ⁤practice.

Level‑Tailored Drills to Isolate putting‍ Mechanics​ and⁢ Promote Transfer

Begin with a reproducible setup that respects the Rules of Golf and ‍supports measurable repeatability: establish a neutral eye‑over‑ball relationship, a consistent stance roughly shoulder‑width, and a weight range of ~40-60% ⁢ on the lead⁤ foot depending on anatomy. Keep putter loft ​near manufacturer⁤ specs (~3-4°) and maintain light grip ‌pressure (~1-3/10). Anchoring is prohibited-use ⁢a free pendulum stroke driven by the shoulders with limited ‌wrist action.

Progress drills‍ by level with clear outcome measures. Examples:

  • Beginner: short gate/alignment-tees 1-2 inches wider than the head; aim for 80-90% clearance ⁣over 20 attempts;
  • Intermediate: ladder ‍at 3, 6, 10 ft to track pace; use a metronome (60-72 bpm) to develop⁢ consistent backswing:follow‑through timing;
  • Advanced: one‑handed mirror work-30 reps (15 each hand) to reduce face rotation variance to ​~±1°.

Target outcomes such as​ a 70% ‍ make rate from 6 ft ​for intermediates within a six‑week block.

To accelerate‍ transfer ‌into the⁢ full ​swing, emphasize common mechanical themes-face control, tempo and axis stability.Transition drills:

  • Impact bag or face‑contact drills to ⁣feel centered​ strikes with ⁣irons and driver;
  • Shallow‑divot or tee‑drills to train low‑point control for mid‑irons;
  • Half‑swing with alignment rod across the‌ bag ⁣to enforce on‑plane movement and maintain an impact ⁤spine tilt of ~5-7°.

When available, use launch monitor targets (face angle ±1.0°, aim for‌ small smash‑factor ‍gains) to quantify transfer. Synchronize tempo-keep a consistent putting ‍rhythm (~1:1 ‌for some players)⁣ and seek a⁣ reproducible backswing:downswing timing in​ full ⁢swings (practical target ~3:1 for many) to stabilize timing and reduce compensations that cause errant drives.

Let course conditions determine drill emphasis. On firm,fast​ greens ​prioritize speed⁢ control with long‑lag ladder ⁢work to consistently leave the ball⁢ a few inches past the hole rather than​ risk aggressive lines; on slow,grainy greens practice longer launch and holding lines. Use pressure simulations (e.g.,‌ 9‑ball challenge)‌ to force decision‑making and⁤ practice⁣ playing‌ to the⁤ safe side of breaks. Aim for measurable course objectives, like cutting three‑putts to ≤0.3 per round,and‌ adapt equipment or technique for exposed,windy greens with shorter backswing ‌or firmer contact.

Provide⁣ a week‑by‑week progression that addresses common faults ⁣and mental routines. ‌Sample goals:

  • Beginners: 15 min/day of ​gate + ​short ladder (target 60% from 3 ft in 4 weeks);
  • Intermediates: add ⁣metronome and one‑handed work (target 70% from 6 ft, reduce three‑putts 25%);
  • Low handicappers: combine transfer drills with launch‑monitor targets and pressure work (maintain‍ face angle ±1° and >65% from ‍6 ft).

Embed‍ a short pre‑shot routine (visualize the⁣ line, rehearse stroke, commit) and‌ keep ​a practice log to track measurable improvements in ‍putting, swing consistency and driving control.

Using Analytics, Green Reading and Tactics to Improve Scoring and Driving Choices

Combine objective diagnostics with tactical planning. use putting ‌analytics (Strokes Gained: Putting,‌ make % by distance) and green speed (stimp) readings to establish a baseline. Track make rates from 3 ft (≥80%), 6 ft (≥50%) and ⁢ 20 ft (≥25%) across sessions, and record ⁤the‍ course Stimp (municipal⁢ greens commonly read ~9-11 ft; ⁤championship greens can be faster). Translate deficits into tactical goals-if lag⁣ putting is weak, prioritize ⁤approaches that leave you inside 20 ft and avoid risky lines on drivable par‑4s. Create a ‌practice→play feedback ⁢loop so⁣ practice targets the weak‍ bands shown by analytics.

Pair green‑reading with stroke mechanics so course reads are reproducible under pressure. Use a consistent setup-feet shoulder‑width, eyes just inside the ball line, and ball under the left eye‍ for right‑handers-to encourage a square face. Aim⁣ for ‍face‑to‑target alignment‍ at ⁤impact within ⁤ ±2°. Adopt a three‑step green reading process-grade, grain, finish-where you estimate slope magnitude, note grain/sun direction and choose a finish zone. Drills⁣ that link reading to execution include:

  • Gate drill for line fidelity;
  • Distance ladder for backswing length​ and tempo⁤ logging;
  • Short‑game green‑reading: test three pin⁣ placements and document how ⁢identical‌ lines change with Stimp.

These​ routines⁤ make‌ on‑course reads more reliable​ and ‍repeatable.

Translate​ putting insights into ‍smarter tee decisions and approach strategies. Prefer positional tee shots over maximum⁤ distance when analytics show ⁣a higher three‑putt rate from long ⁢or awkward approaches-e.g., play⁢ a 3‑wood or long iron to a wider landing ‍area⁣ to leave an easier approach. design landing zones that let slope assist feed shots toward pins rather than working against you. Equipment choices matter: a slightly higher driver loft or a more compliant shaft can reduce sidespin and improve dispersion; ensure putter ​length and lie suit your posture ⁤for a consistent‌ stroke.

Close the short‑game ⁣loop ‍by turning missed greens into one‑putt or up‑and‑down opportunities. For chips⁤ and pitches: use a ‍lower center‑of‑gravity setup (~60% forward) ⁢for chips, choose less loft for more rollout, and keep hands ahead at impact to avoid thin/skulled contact. Sample measurable routines:

  • 50 ⁤chips from 10-30 yards with a target of⁢ 70% within 10 ft;
  • 30 bunker shots aiming for 80% soft landings inside ​6 ft;
  • Variable‑lie challenge: same shot from tight/plugged/uphill to build adaptability.

Couple these technical drills with a ‌pre‑shot ⁢checklist-read lie/hazards, confirm landing zone, select club/shape, rehearse one ‌swing thought-and track seasonal⁢ goals (e.g., halve three‑putts⁤ or increase fairways⁣ hit ‍by⁤ 10%) using strokes‑gained and make‑percentage metrics. Analytics + ‍technique + tactics = measurable scoring gains.

Neuromuscular Training and Pressure‑Resilience Methods for Putting and Competitive Driving

Reliable ⁣neuromuscular control⁢ begins with a repeatable posture⁤ and sensory routine that primes the nervous system for consistent motor output. For putting, align eyes ~1-2 inches ⁣over the ​ball or on ‌the line, balance ~50/50 on the feet, and set the putter with roughly 3-4° loft. For driving, adopt a⁣ stance of shoulder ‍width⁤ + 2-3 inches, ball just inside the lead heel and a forward spine tilt of ~5-10° to promote an upward attack. consistent pre‑rep checks-grip ⁢pressure⁣ (putting 2-3/10; driving 4-5/10), parallel alignment of ⁤shoulders/hips/feet and verified eye ⁤line-help the player rely on proprioception instead of conscious micro‑adjustments, which supports durability under ‍pressure.

Train neuromuscular timing for putting by isolating stroke ‌variables-backswing length, tempo and ‌impact spot-and using measurable ‌targets. Aim ⁢for a tempo around ​ 2:1 for​ many​ short distances with the stroke acting‍ as a ‍shoulder pendulum. ‍Useful drills:

  • Clock drill: putt‌ from 3, 6, 9, ​12 ft⁣ to standardize stroke length;
  • Gate drill: ⁤tees outside the path to reinforce square impact;
  • 3-12-30 ladder: one ball ‍at 3, 12⁤ and 30 ft⁤ to track pace and one‑putt percent.

Measure ‌progress with Strokes Gained: Putting, face‑impact percentage in the sweet‍ spot and roll‑out variance (target ±10%).

For driving,focus on coordinated sequencing rather than brute force: lower ⁢body initiates,hips lead,torso follows,then arms/club. Target weight‍ transfer of roughly ~60% to ​the lead foot at impact and monitor launch metrics: smash factor ~1.45, launch ‍angle ~10-14° (player dependent), and spin⁢ rates tuned‌ to conditions (~1800-3000 rpm). Drills ⁣include:

  • Step drill to promote early lower‑body initiation;
  • pause at top to sync hip rotation and ​avoid casting;
  • Half‑swing ​to impact bag to train compression without full speed stress.

Use video and launch data to quantify changes and set incremental goals (e.g., reduce lateral⁤ sway by 50% in four weeks).

Pressure training combines​ task stressors, sequential pre‑shot routines and physiological regulation to preserve performance when it matters. Build a concise pre‑shot ritual⁣ with ‌ 3-5 diaphragmatic breaths,⁣ visualize the impact point⁢ and rehearse the rhythm. simulate⁢ competitive pressure with graded⁢ stressors-time limits, consequence ⁢scoring, or audience noise-and record resilience by measuring putt distance variance or drive ‌dispersion under stress. Pressure drills include:

  • Beat‑the‑score: set a practice‑nine target with ⁤penalties ​for misses;
  • Clock with consequences: require a minimum make rate on long putts to “earn” par ‌save⁤ attempts;
  • Heart‑rate check: monitor pre‑shot pulse and ‌practice breathing to reduce it⁤ ~5-10 bpm before execution.

These routines help players shift control from ⁤conscious correction to automatic execution,⁤ reducing choke and improving reliability under ⁢match conditions.

Integrate technical work into​ course strategy and equipment choices to⁢ convert practice gains into lower scores. ⁤Adjust putter loft, grip or shaft length in response​ to measured impact patterns-e.g., add ~ loft if consistent heel strikes cause skids. In adverse conditions favor conservative driving targets and​ lower‑spin trajectories; plan a 12‑week program‍ with weekly metrics (increase one‑putt % by ~5%,⁣ shrink driving dispersion ⁤circle by ~20 yards) and include cross‑training ⁣(balance, core, reaction drills) to enhance neuromuscular efficiency. With a combination of tactile practice, situational‍ simulations and mental work, players​ can systematically increase ⁣stroke reliability and translate technical gains into better scoring.

What Motion Capture and Force‑Plate Data Reveal-and How to Train From It

Three‑dimensional motion capture paired with force‑plate analysis gives precise, objective insight into putting kinematics and the mechanics that generate driving power. Motion capture measures joint ⁤angles,club path ⁢and torso‑pelvis separation;⁢ force‍ plates measure center‑of‑pressure (COP),ground reaction forces (GRF) ⁤and the timing of weight transfer. Practically useful targets ‌include pelvic‍ rotation (~40-60° in a full ⁢driver turn for many players), shoulder ‍turn (~80-100° for​ lower handicaps) ‍and peak vertical GRF (commonly ~1.1-1.4× body⁤ weight ​at impact for‌ powerful swings).For putting,monitor⁢ putter face rotation at impact ( goal),stroke ‍arc radius and COP lateral displacement (desirable 2 cm). These metrics let coaches convert lab findings into on‑green and on‑range interventions.

Turn lab data⁢ into field drills:

  • Putting pendulum‍ drill-stabilize ⁣shoulders, ⁣limit⁢ wrist ⁣motion, use ​a metronome (60-70 bpm)⁤ and log face rotation aiming <3°;
  • Gate & arc drill-pass the putter through narrow gates to⁤ keep a consistent radius and square⁢ face;
  • Step‑in sequencing-half backswing then step into ⁤the⁤ downswing‌ to teach​ timing for⁤ weight transfer;
  • Medicine‑ball rotational throws-develop torque transfer from ground to ⁣torso for driving power.

Set measurable targets-reduce putter ‌face rotation to <3° within six weeks, or increase clubhead speed by⁤ 2-4 mph over 8-12 weeks-and validate with repeat testing.

Diagnose faults by linking kinematic patterns​ to force‑plate ⁤signals. Early extension in the driver often ⁢shows reduced pelvic rotation and an ⁢anterior COP shift; cue “sit back and rotate” and use drills that ‍maintain knee flex. excessive lateral sway in putting manifests as COP excursions >2 cm ​and variable face rotation; correct with a narrower stance‍ or a ⁤slight forward press. Practical ⁢checkpoints:

  • Setup: square shoulders, consistent eye line, ⁢ball position repeatable;
  • Tempo: metronome for putting and ​a 3:1 backswing:downswing rhythm for driving⁣ work;
  • Weight ⁣targets: lead‑side weight ~60-70% at driver impact and minimal lateral​ shift for putting.

These ⁢cues are⁣ scalable from⁤ beginners to low ‌handicaps ⁣seeking marginal gains.

Bring lab gains onto⁣ the course by adapting to ⁤conditions. On firm ⁢greens use shorter backswing and firmer feel to reduce⁤ skid; on soft surfaces increase pendulum length and⁣ launch. Into ⁢wind, reduce tee height and tighten the release to produce a lower, penetrating flight. Example⁣ situational targets:

  • For 40-80 ft lag putts downhill on firm greens, practice leaving the ‌ball inside 3 ⁣ft ⁢ at least 60% of the time via progressive length repeats;
  • On tight fairways with ⁣hazards,​ shorten ⁢swing length by ~10-15%⁢ to ⁤improve accuracy ‍with acceptable distance loss.

These adaptations⁣ tie technical improvements directly to smarter on‑course decision making.

Structure a performance program‌ combining technical sessions, monitored retests⁢ and ‍mental‌ routines. Test motion‑capture and force‑plate metrics every ~4-8⁤ weeks to quantify changes in pelvis​ rotation, shoulder separation, COP path and ‍GRF peaks. A weekly schedule might include​ two technical sessions, one on‑course simulation and ‍one​ strength/mobility session focused on ⁢hip⁢ and core. For players with⁣ limitations,provide ​modified progressions (single‑arm drills,seated ‌rotation or reduced‑turn ⁢swings). ⁤Pair technical‌ training with breathing⁢ and process goals (e.g., “square​ face at impact”) to embed changes under pressure. Retest and adjust when improvements plateau ​and ⁤always end practice with on‑course or pressure ‍simulations to ensure transfer.⁣ By combining lab data with targeted drills and⁣ tactical application, players can achieve measurable ​gains in​ putting consistency and driving power that convert into lower scores.

tools ‍and Thresholds to Monitor Putting ‍Progress and Link It to⁢ Driving

Establish a quantitative⁤ baseline using ⁤both portable ​tech ​and simple field tests. Use a launch monitor (trackman, FlightScope) ‌or GPS shot trackers⁣ (Shot Scope, Arccos) to capture driving metrics-average carry, total distance, fairway‍ %⁤ and lateral dispersion-and clubface‍ angle at impact. for putting, combine a putting⁢ analyzer (Blast, SAM PuttLab) or stable video ⁤capture to log ball speed, launch characteristics and impact face angle; supplement with proximity‑to‑hole (P2H)⁣ bands (0-3, 3-6, ⁢6-10, 10-15, 15-25 ft), putts per round⁣ and ‍three‑putt rate. Initial protocol: record 10 representative drives and 30 putts from defined⁤ distances (10×3 ⁤ft, 10×6 ft, 10×20 ‍ft) to create a repeatable baseline.

Set tiered performance ‍thresholds by skill ‌level to focus practice. ⁢Useful benchmarks:

  • Putts per round: >35 (beginner),30-34​ (intermediate),28-30 (advanced),<28 ​(competitive);
  • P2H for approaches: intermediates ~6-10 ft,advanced <6 ft;
  • Conversion goals: >85% from 3 ft and >60% from 6 ft ‍as ‍progressive targets;
  • Driving: fairways hit ‍~40-55% (amateur),55-70% ⁤(skilled); lateral dispersion <20 yards (amateur),<12 yards (low handicap).

These thresholds let you quantify how better driving ‍(fewer long approaches, higher‌ GIR) shortens⁤ putts and reduces three‑putts.

Implement drills and test protocols⁣ that directly affect recorded metrics:

  • Gate ⁢alignment: two tees just wider than the head; 50 ⁤reps to lock in face control;
  • Clock/radius: 10 putts each from 3, 6, 9, 12 ‌ft; log make %⁢ and P2H;
  • Ladder distance: ⁤putt to ‍6, 12, 20, 30 ft and measure ball speed; aim for ±0.5 ft proximity consistency;
  • Driving ‍dispersion test: 10 ⁢drives to target; compute lateral SD⁤ and ‍aim for incremental reductions (e.g., 20% over six weeks).

If deceleration through impact appears,shorten the ​stroke‌ and emphasize acceleration through⁤ the target. ‍If face ⁢rotation is high, simplify ​to‍ a shoulder pendulum and quiet hands.

use driving metrics to inform course management. If dispersion is excessive,choose a club that increases fairway​ % (3‑wood or long iron) and thereby increases the chance of approaches ⁢inside your ​P2H targets.Quantitatively, reducing approach distance by⁢ 10-15 yards​ often converts lag putts ‍into makeable 10-15 ft attempts and‌ improves ‌conversion ⁢rates. Track weekly ‍(100 putts with ladder/clock ⁣and ‌one⁢ 9‑hole simulated round) and monthly (compare drive dispersion,fairway % and‍ P2H) to reallocate practice time-e.g., shift focus to⁣ putting if P2H ⁤improves but putts per round stall. Troubleshooting checkpoints:

  • Confirm putter face alignment and loft;
  • Aim for ball‑speed SD of ±1 ft/s on repeated long putts;
  • Reduce ⁢driver⁤ face⁢ angle bias through grip/takeaway tweaks if needed.

add a concise pre‑shot⁤ routine ‌and mental rehearsal to reduce variability under⁤ pressure. ⁤A data‑driven monitoring system⁤ ties drills‍ to⁢ course outcomes​ and ensures enduring improvement in putting and driving accuracy.

Coach‑Led‌ Progressions: ​From Assessment to‍ On‑Course Transfer

Begin with a structured coach assessment ⁢to ⁣establish objective​ baselines before prescribing ‍change. Run a motion screen and on‑range battery to capture clubhead speed, ball speed, smash factor, attack and launch angles;‍ for​ putting measure stroke ‌path, face angle SD and distance ‍variance. Add an on‑course audit-GIR, scrambling %, putts per ⁢hole and​ driving dispersion-and derive prioritized learning goals ​(e.g., reduce three‑putts​ to <10% in 8-12 weeks or gain 10-20 yards carry with the driver).⁢ Note physical constraints (thoracic rotation, hip mobility) ⁤so the program blends movement remediation and technical change ​for safer, lasting⁤ results.

Progress the full swing ⁢with ⁣sequential kinematic ‍and feel‑based cues that honor the player’s movement‌ style. Start with setup basics (neutral ​spine, ball position: driver at left heel, mid‑irons center/slightly left) and an address weight balance (~55/45). Coach the sequence:‍ trail leg ⁣ground force ⁣→ pelvic rotation →⁣ shoulder turn ‌→ wrist hinge → hands/club. Use drills with measurable checkpoints:

  • Step ⁤drill for ⁢sequencing;
  • Impact bag ⁣to encourage⁣ forward shaft lean and compression;
  • Slow ¾ swings with video feedback to refine plane and timing.

Address casting, over‑the‑top and early extension ⁣with targeted feel cues and external focus (e.g.,keep trail ‌elbow‌ tucked). Quantify progress via clubhead⁤ speed, attack angle and dispersion.

For putting, emphasize a repeatable setup ​and a stroke​ that limits face variability: neutral eye‑over‑ball, either shoulder‑rock or short‑arm stroke per preference, and a grip⁢ that leaves the wrists passive. As anchoring is banned, teach allowed long‑putter techniques without body⁣ anchoring.‌ Prescribe distance ​drills with⁢ strict tolerances:

  • Distance ladder: 3-20 ft targets with finishing ​circles (12‑inch for short, 3‑ft for 15-20 ft);
  • Gate drill: tees slightly wider than head for square impact;
  • Clock drill: 12 ⁤makes ‍from ‌3 ft to ‌cultivate pressure tolerance.

Track improvements with putts per round and strokes‑gained: putting.

Driving prescriptions combine launch optimization and accuracy shaping. Start with equipment matching​ (loft/shaft ⁢to swing speed-players 95-105 mph often⁤ favor 9-11° drivers; ⁤slower⁤ speeds‌ need more loft), then refine tee ⁣height‌ and⁣ ball⁣ position ‌to encourage a‌ slightly upward attack. Drills:

  • tee‑target: ⁢ alignment clubs define a launch corridor;
  • Overspeed ‍work: use lighter implements safely to boost top speed;
  • Impact tape: train center‑face contact to cut sidespin.

Set measurable goals (reduce dispersion to ‍±15 yards, increase carry by planned yardage) and verify via launch‑monitor‍ sessions.

Blend technique with periodization, course play and mental routines to ensure on‑course transfer. ‌Weekly microcycles could include 2-3 technical sessions, focused putting blocks and ‍one simulated round. Include⁤ situation training (heavy ⁣rough, firm fairways) and ‍trajectory control for wind. Use simple ‌pre‑shot checklists-visualize, align, set tempo-and link breathing ⁢cues and single‑focus thoughts to ​reduce yips and tension. Monitor outcomes with ​KPI (strokes ⁤gained, GIR, scrambling, putts per ⁤round)⁣ so evidence‑based interventions yield measurable ‍scoring improvements across⁣ skill levels.

Q&A

Note on​ sources: ​the web search results provided did ⁤not contain⁢ material specific to‌ putting. The answers below represent a synthesis of contemporary motor‑learning, biomechanics and coaching practice as applied to putting and transfer to the full‌ swing.

Q1. How should “mastery” of putting be ‍defined academically?

A1. Define mastery operationally⁣ as reproducible reductions in performance variability and measurable increases in task ⁢success under realistic constraints-improvements in make% at standard distances,⁣ reduced meen miss distance (P2H),⁤ and lower kinematic variability ​(e.g., face‑angle SD). Combine outcome metrics, kinematic measurement and structured practice grounded in motor‑learning principles for an academic ⁤framing.

Q2.Which objective metrics matter most?

A2. ​Track: ⁣make%⁢ by distance (3, 6, 10, 20 ft), mean distance‑to‑hole for ⁤misses, SD of face angle at​ impact‌ and launch direction, impact location relative to ‍sweet spot (mm), ball speed consistency (m/s), stroke tempo​ ratio and its SD, and Strokes Gained: Putting when available. ‍Collect baselines and periodic‌ retests (means,‌ SDs, coefficients ⁤of variation).

Q3. What biomechanical variables drive putting success?

A3. Primary drivers: face angle at ⁣impact, launch direction/initial ball speed, impact point, stroke‍ path (arc vs straight) and temporal ​control. Secondary factors include head stability,​ lower‑body rigidity and⁤ eye‑hand‍ coordination. Reducing variability across these ⁤dimensions is more crucial than chasing a single “ideal” value.

Q4.​ How do ​you measure and train⁤ tempo?

A4. Use a metronome,IMU​ or high‑speed video to time backswing⁤ and forward durations. Aim for a consistent ⁢backswing:forward ⁣ratio (often ‍~2:1 for short putts) with absolute timing adjusted to comfort. Train with metronome blocks ‌(30-50 reps),fade feedback,then progress to randomized distances⁢ while preserving tempo. Success​ is indicated by low SD in ratio (<5-10%) ​and improved make%.

Q5. Which drills⁣ reduce face‑angle variability?

A5. Gate drills (teed gates just ⁢outside the face)⁣ and impact‑tape protocols deliver measurable improvement: conduct 50‍ gate reps and aim for <10% contact rate; ⁢apply impact tape ⁤across 30 strokes⁢ and⁤ target a mean strike within ±10-12 mm of⁤ center and reduced SD ⁢over time. Use video ⁢or ⁣IMU feedback in blocks with faded delivery.

Q6. Blocked vs random practice-what’s ‍best?

A6. Start with blocked practice to build a stable⁣ pattern,‍ then shift toward ⁣increased variability and ⁢randomization to improve retention⁤ and transfer. ⁤Practical‍ phasing: Weeks ⁣1-2‌ mostly ‌blocked, ‍Weeks 3-5 introduce variability, ‌weeks ⁤6+ ⁤high contextual interference and pressure ⁣simulations, with scheduled reflection and faded feedback.

Q7.Practical pace‑control drills?

A7. Three‑meter ladder (3,6,9 m targets) with % finishing ‍within 0.5 m;‍ two‑bounce drill ⁢for⁣ long⁢ putts counting successes in⁣ 30 attempts; and ball‑speed sensor blocks aiming for ±0.2 m/s consistency⁢ across 20 putts.

Q8. How does putting‌ practice help⁢ the full swing?

A8.‍ Shared principles-precise ​face control, ⁢stable posture and reliable tempo-generalize. The sensorimotor ⁤sensitivity trained on the green improves face‑angle consistency and ​impact awareness⁢ in the long game; tempo learned at low speed can be scaled to higher‑speed swings ‌to improve sequencing ​and timing.

Q9. What is a practical ⁤test battery?

A9.A 45-60 minute battery: ⁤30×3‑ft putts,⁤ 40×6‑ft putts, 30×10‑ft putts (record make% and miss distance), 20×20‑ft‌ lag⁢ putts (mean distance), and ‌if possible 30 kinematic strokes (face angle mean/SD,⁣ impact location mean/SD, tempo ratio mean/SD). use paired ​comparisons and effect sizes to quantify‍ change.

Q10. How‍ should feedback be scheduled?

A10. Start frequent and ​specific (KR/KP), then ⁣progressively fade feedback to foster intrinsic error detection. Use external KPIs when they reduce ⁢variability, and⁤ encourage video self‑review for internalization.

Q11. Equipment-how much does it matter?

A11. Equipment influences roll and feel; test⁢ putter‌ loft/length/shape quantitatively. Select ​the setup that minimizes directional and speed⁣ variance-e.g., the length that‌ produces the lowest face‑angle ​SD ⁢and the head that yields the most centered​ impacts. Use‌ launch⁤ data to ‍confirm optimal loft for early forward roll.

Q12. How to train under pressure?

A12. Simulate stakes (monetary, scoring), ⁤impose time limits or penalties, add fatigue and monitor performance changes. Transfer ‌is assessed by⁤ comparing baseline and pressured make% and ⁤kinematic variability. Deficits indicate a‍ need for mental skills work and further ⁤proceduralization.

Q13. Injury risks from heavy putting volume?

A13. Watch ⁤for wrist/forearm tendinopathy and neck/back strain. Prescribe blocks of 30-60⁣ reps with rest, include mobility breaks and ‌reduce volume if pain appears; consult sports⁣ medicine if ⁢symptoms persist.

Q14.‌ Example 8‑week program ⁢(measurable)

A14.Weeks 1-2 Foundations: ‍blocked tempo & gate drills, 30-40 min, reduce face‑angle SD ~10%, raise 6‑ft make%⁢ 5-10%. Weeks 3-4 Variability: random‌ distances & impact tape, 40-50 min, improve 10‑ft make% and lower ball‑speed SD. Weeks 5-6 Contextual interference: slopes and pressure, 45-60 min, improve long‑putt distance‑to‑hole by 15-25%. Weeks 7-8 Transfer & test: simulated rounds​ and retest battery aiming for notable ⁢SG:P gains.

Q15. ⁢Common errors and corrective cues?

A15. Open face​ → ‍mirror/gate feedback, target ⁣mean angle reduction; excessive‌ wrist action⁢ → shoulder‑driven stroke, towel under forearms; poor⁣ pace → metronome/ball‑speed work aiming ‍for ball‑speed SD <±0.2-0.4 m/s; inconsistent⁢ impact → soften lead ​hand, use impact ​tape ⁣to center strikes.

Q16. How to report outcomes?

A16. Report pre/post ⁢means, SDs, effect sizes and CIs for key metrics.Use measurement ⁤reliability thresholds and discuss practical importance (e.g., a 5% uptick ‌at 10 ft translates to strokes saved). Be obvious​ about sample and environment limits.

Q17. When⁣ to use specialists or advanced ‍tools?

A17. Consult a specialist if progress stalls, pain occurs or issues are complex. Advanced tools ⁣(high‑speed cameras, IMUs, launch monitors) are worthwhile when they deliver ​actionable data‌ that change coaching decisions; interpret them in the context of on‑course ⁢outcomes.

Closing summary

An evidence‑driven approach to putting centers on measurable⁢ goals, purposeful manipulation of⁢ practice variables (blocked→random), rigorous monitoring⁢ of ​kinematic ⁤and outcome metrics, and targeted drills that reduce variance in face angle, impact location and pace. Periodic testing‌ and pressure simulations enhance ⁣transfer not only to putting but also to full‑swing and driving through shared principles of tempo, face control and postural ‌stability.

If you‍ prefer,I can: (a) create a ‌printable test sheet with recording columns; (b) build a tailored 8‑week plan from your baseline scores; or (c) condense the drills ⁢into a daily 30‑minute routine-tell me which you ‍want.

Next Steps

This article synthesized biomechanics, motor‑learning theory and applied practice ⁤design to​ reposition putting as a pivotal ⁤contributor to overall stroke economy and scoring. By treating putting, driving and the full swing‌ as linked‍ systems-each⁣ governed by repeatable kinematic and⁣ performance metrics-coaches and players can move beyond intuition to a structured, measurement‑based‍ process for diagnosing faults, prescribing level‑appropriate drills and tracking improvement. Practical takeaways include ‍planning‍ practice⁤ around variability‍ and contextual interference, applying augmented and intrinsic feedback judiciously, and ⁣using‍ consistent metrics (face angle, stroke tempo, launch and roll data, proximity to hole) to quantify ⁢transfer from practice⁢ to play.

For practitioners: iterate-assess baseline, apply phased interventions grounded in motor‑control, and reassess to close the learning⁣ loop. For researchers: test longitudinally whether integrated training protocols produce consistent on‑course scoring benefits across ability levels. Ultimately, ⁤a measurement‑first, academic approach to⁤ putting promises not only short‑term consistency but durable improvements‍ in swing and driving by aligning technique, strategy and practice with ⁣empirically supported principles.

Unlock Elite ⁣Golf Performance: ⁤Science-Backed Putting, Swing​ & Driving Secrets

Unlock Elite Golf Performance:⁢ Science-Backed Putting, Swing & ‍driving Secrets

Why Science⁣ Matters for‍ Better Golf

Elite golf performance comes from combining biomechanics, data-driven​ practice, and smart ⁢course management. Whether you want⁢ to⁢ improve your golf swing, master putting, or upgrade driving accuracy and‍ distance,⁣ evidence-based methods shorten the learning curve. Below are practical, research-informed techniques and progressive golf drills that deliver measurable results.

Golf ‌Biomechanics:⁢ The Foundation of a Consistent Swing

Key biomechanical principles

  • Sequential energy transfer (kinetic chain): Power originates from the ground, travels⁢ through the legs and torso, then to​ the arms and clubhead. Efficient sequencing increases clubhead speed while reducing injury risk.
  • Stable base⁤ and center of mass control: ​A balanced, athletic stance lets you store rotational energy without excessive lateral ​sway.
  • Angular momentum and‌ rotation: Effective hip-shoulder⁣ separation and controlled torso rotation create ‍torque and clubhead speed while maintaining accuracy.
  • Connection and clubface control: Wrist hinge,⁣ forearm ‌rotation, and consistent impact position control launch angle and spin for predictable ball flight.

target metrics to monitor (use a launch monitor)

  • Clubhead speed (mph)
  • Ball speed (mph)
  • Launch angle (degrees)
  • Spin rate (rpm)
  • Smash factor (ball⁢ speed ‍/ ‌clubhead⁣ speed)
  • Side/angle ‍of attack and ​club path

Stepwise Golf Swing Improvements: ⁣Mechanics & Drills

Essential setup and tempo

  • Neutral grip-pressure light to⁣ moderate;⁣ avoid squeezing.Grip pressure often rises under stress and ruins tempo.
  • Athletic posture-slight knee flex, neutral spine, hinge at hips, chest over feet.
  • Balanced ball position-forward for long⁢ clubs, ​centered for mid-irons, back for wedges if you want‍ more loft and control.
  • Tempo and rhythm-use the 3:1 backswing-to-downswing tempo pattern: slower backswing, ‍quicker acceleration through impact.

Progressive swing drills

  • Hip-turn wall drill: Stand with your trail hip near ⁣a⁤ wall.‌ Rotate back and forth without hitting‌ the wall to‌ feel reduced lateral slide and improved rotation.
  • Step-through⁤ drill: Swing to ⁤impact, step forward ​with your lead foot on the follow-through to encourage weight transfer and balanced finish.
  • Impact​ bag ⁤drill: ⁤ Strike an impact ​bag or soft object to ingrain ​a forward shaft lean and compressive impact position.
  • Slow-motion ⁣video feedback: Record swings at 120+ fps and compare with model swings-small changes in timing and sequence‌ are visible.

Driving Secrets: Maximize Distance Without Losing Accuracy

Launch conditions for optimal driving

To⁢ maximize driving distance, aim for the ⁤right combination of ⁣launch angle and⁣ spin rate matched to your clubhead speed. Higher clubhead speed usually benefits from slightly lower spin to‌ avoid ballooning; slower speeds often need higher launch and moderate spin ‌for carry.

  • Ideal launch angle: usually between 10-16° (depends‍ on spin and swing ⁤speed).
  • Ideal spin rate: 1800-3000 rpm for drivers (lower is generally better​ for faster players).
  • Smash factor⁤ target: >1.45 indicates efficient energy transfer.

Driving accuracy drills

  • Tee-target ‌drill: Place a towel or headcover ​10-15 yards downrange as a narrow visual aiming point. Practice hitting fairway-targeted ⁣tee shots.
  • Gate drill: Set two alignment sticks a few inches wider than your driver head and swing through without hitting them to ensure square face at impact.
  • Controlled-power reps: 10 swings at 80% ‌speed focusing on tempo and path; 5 swings at 100% power to simulate course intensity.

Putting: Precision, Feel & Green Reading

Science-backed putting fundamentals

  • Low-stroke variability: ‌ Research shows repeatable pendulum motion around the shoulders reduces face rotation and improves consistency.
  • Distance control (stroke length vs.⁣ speed): Use stroke length to ‍control pace; practice with varying start speeds to calibrate force perception.
  • Reading break and pace: Read the putt from multiple angles and evaluate both speed (how fast the ball⁣ must roll) and line (break).

Putting drills for‌ immediate gains

  • Gate putting drill: Place tees⁣ just wider than your putter head to train a square path and consistent face angle through impact.
  • Distance ladder: Putt to 3, 6, 9, 12 ‌feet focusing on ⁤getting ⁤the ball within a designated “two-putt” zone to build pacing accuracy.
  • Clock drill: From 3-4 feet around the hole at 12 points, try making a set number (e.g., 9/12) to build pressure handling.

Short Game & Course Management

Chipping and pitching priorities

  • Choose landing spots for ⁢chips-control roll by deciding where the ball lands and how much ​it runs out.
  • Open-face for higher, softer shots; square face for bump-and-run shots.
  • Practice a “1-2-3” distance control routine: determine‍ target green point, select loft/club, and visualize roll.

Smart course management

  • Play to your strengths: if your‍ driving‌ accuracy is less consistent,favor safer tee shots‌ to set ​up easier approaches.
  • Know when to attack‍ vs. play conservatively-risk-reward decisions are where many‍ strokes are won or lost.
  • Use ‌slope and ⁣wind to your advantage-play angles, not just yardages.

Training Plan: 6-Week⁤ Progressive Program (Sample)

Week Focus Key Drills Session Goal
1 setup & Tempo alignment sticks, slow-motion swings Consistent setup & 3:1 tempo
2 Rotation & Impact Hip-turn wall, impact bag Improve hip-shoulder⁢ separation
3 Driving Launch gate drill, launch monitor ​checks Optimize launch/spin
4 Putting Pace Distance ladder, gate putting Consistent 3-20 ⁣ft⁣ strokes
5 Short Game Control Landing-spot ‌chips, bump-and-runs Repeatable trajectory choices
6 On-course Simulation 9-hole ⁢pressure play, ​pre-shot routine Transfer practice to play

Equipment & Technology ​That Boost‍ Performance

  • Fit your clubs: Proper shaft flex, loft,⁣ and lie angle affect launch and accuracy. A custom fitting with a launch monitor is‍ high ROI.
  • Use a‍ launch monitor: Devices like‍ TrackMan, FlightScope, or SkyTrak provide objective metrics for progress (ball speed, spin, launch angle).
  • Putter fitting: Length, lie, ⁣and​ head shape change stroke mechanics-test several styles to⁢ find​ the best match for your stroke.

Mental game ​& Pre-shot Routine

  • Consistent pre-shot routine: Calm breathing, target visualization, and an‍ identical ​setup sequence reduce anxiety and improve execution.
  • Chunk goals: Focus on process goals (alignment,tempo) rather than outcome goals (score) ⁤to ⁤maintain performance under ⁣pressure.
  • Post-shot reflection: Briefly ‍note one ⁢thing that went well ⁤and one adjustment-keep it short to maintain flow.

Benefits & Practical Tips

  • Less practice, smarter practice: ​Short, focused sessions (30-60 minutes) with⁤ deliberate drills are more effective than long unfocused ⁣ranges.
  • Data-driven adjustments: Use objective metrics (smash factor, spin rate) to guide changes ‍rather than feeling‌ alone.
  • recovery & mobility: Incorporate hip and thoracic mobility work-improved range of motion ‍yields better rotation and lower injury‍ risk.

Case Study: One Golfer’s 8-Week Turnaround (Practical ‌Example)

A ⁤12-handicap amateur with inconsistent drives ​and three-putts followed the 6-week plan above⁣ and⁣ added a weekly mobility routine. Key outcomes after 8 weeks:

  • Clubhead speed up 3-5 ​mph, increasing average driving distance by ~12 yards (monitored via launch monitor).
  • Smash factor improved from 1.38 to 1.45 after impact-bag and strike drills.
  • 1-putt rate inside 20 ft⁢ improved from 22%⁤ to 41% after dedicated ⁤distance ladder ‌and gate putting practice.
  • Average score‍ dropped by 4 ⁤strokes across several rounds⁤ due to improved course management ⁤and consistent putting.

First-Hand Experience tips from Coaches

  • Coaches commonly recommend​ a two-week focus window per major ‍swing change-don’t attempt multiple big⁤ mechanical changes at once.
  • Video feedback and immediate tactile drills (impact bag, gate) produce faster motor learning than verbal cues alone.
  • Record metrics before and after any major change to validate improvement; feelings can be misleading.

SEO and Practice Keywords (Naturally Integrated)

This guide included high-value golf ⁣keywords such ‍as golf swing,putting ‍tips,driving accuracy,golf drills,golf biomechanics,course management,golf ‌training,short game,distance control and launch monitor to improve search visibility ‍and help golfers ⁤find actionable content⁢ quickly.

Speedy Reference: 5-Minute Pre-Round Routine

  • Dynamic mobilization‌ (2⁤ minutes): hip circles, trunk ⁣rotations.
  • Short-range putting⁤ (2 minutes): 3-4 putts inside 6 ft‍ to build feel.
  • Three progressive swings (1 minute):‍ 50%-80%-100% focusing on tempo and balance.

Use the drills and progressions above consistently, measure results with a launch monitor or measurable⁢ performance goals, and prioritize smart, focused⁤ practice. Apply course management ​and a⁣ calm pre-shot routine and the combination of biomechanical consistency + data-driven training will unlock elite golf performance.

Previous Article

This clever tool helped me eliminate a ‘blindspot’ from my practice

Next Article

Game-Changing Golf Gear: 8 Essential Tools to Perfect Your Swing and Putting

You might be interested in …

1 reason Justin Thomas is contending at Zozo? His putter

1 reason Justin Thomas is contending at Zozo? His putter

Justin Thomas is making waves at the Zozo Championship with his scorching putter skills. Shooting impressive rounds of 64 and 65, Thomas has nailed an impressive 16 out of 24 putts from within 10 feet, placing him in a tie for the lead as he gears up for the weekend showdown. His putting prowess has been a consistent highlight throughout the season, ranking an impressive fourth in strokes gained putting on the PGA Tour. Notably, Thomas excels as one of the top putters on the Tour from close range. The key to his success lies in his ability to sink those crucial putts, making him a formidable contender at the Zozo Championship. If Thomas can maintain his stellar putting performance, the competition will have a tough challenge ahead. Source: [Golf Lessons Channel](https://golflessonschannel.com/1-reason-justin-thomas-is-contending-at-zozo-his-putter/)